This year Ukraine, Russia, Belarus rights campaigners won Nobel Prize an "Apolitical" award or is it?. Baisically, they are anti Russia activists, they come in limelight because west doesn’t like Putin who doesn’t like stand up comedian jew planted as Ukrainian PM next door. At Nobel Peace Prize ceremony held at Oslo City Hall, this year’s winners from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine shared their visions and denounced Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine on Sat, 10 Dec, 2022. "Apolotical".
Above news is screaming at the top of its voice that desi Kala goras (liberal extremists) who think award of Nobel Prize to Malala was "apolitical", they live in a fool’s paradise. Malala’s case was as "apolitical" as Bajwa’s. You just have to sing to the tunes of the west in disregard and disrespect of your own cultural values, national interest and religious ideology and you already are a strong candidate to become Nobel Laureate. The loudest anti-non-west is heard the farthest, quite an 'apolitical' recipe. Things are not ideal in non-western part of the world. But they won’t get any better if one of their own starts negating everything about them including good ones. Such social traitors are well received, highly paid and given microphones on ‘illustrious’ forums.
The only defence cum argument of Liberal Extremists (as bad as religious extremists) is that conservatives can’t take it, they are insecure or jealous of women emancipation, is total BS. Its time that west stops forcing its way of life on others by spotting vulnerable imbeciles (who believe they are rebels/ reformers) in target non-western societies.
West, at the moment, is the leading and rich civilisation and to keep their hold on the non-western world, they need deep ingress into those societies. Malala and family are the ideal opportunists who readily offer their services on political, social and ideological plains. Such operations are blatantly being carried out through NGOs among less fortunate regions like Africa, SE Asia or upcoming societies like Chinese.
Hypocrisy that world doesn’t understand or doesn’t want to understand is that those Norwegian (Literature) and Swedish (Scientists) academics are not paying each winner 100,000 USD in the name of humanity but to buy their loyalties, enslave them through regulations, keep them on their radar and control/ restrict their works to their benefit only. Quite "apolitical".
Unfortunate, that daughter of the soil (Malala) received gunshots but real misery began when she ended up in wrong hands. But since she and her father happily "upgraded" their lives by moving to UK like rest of those ‘finance driven’ migrations from our part of the world, it was pretty much a Hobson’s Choice for them. West needed an implant and they needed an upgrade. So an average IQ girl from Swat KPK, gets circumstantial exposure and becomes a global figure. Hence, with due exposure, this girl grooms herself into a well rounded, 'socially acceptable' young woman in west. Good for her.
Nothing wrong with her meteoric rise to fame after receiving gunshots but liberal extremists blinded by prejudice against native social orthodoxy, never tire of eulogies about this girl with total disregard to their own lineage.
Concluding by three pointer.
1. Nobel Peace Prize is anything but apolitical. Its political to hilt.
2. Malala got the right opportunity through unfortunate turn of events which is good for her and her family and those who invested in her.
3. The most confused lot in this country at par with religious extremists are liberal extremists who ruled this country all these years (Both from Army & Civil) and never tire of whining against country, society and religion.
Very much true sir
ReplyDelete