Death of The Queen

Queen’s Death - UK version: There will be a lot of emotional outpouring in UK. However, she clung on until the end to the monarchy because the monarchy which is the head of the aristocracy remained relevant and strong under her leadership protecting the aristocracy. It can be safely concluded that her life struggle revolved around maintaining relevance of monarchy in UK. There is nothing individualist in British Monarchy rather an institutionalised cult where Royals follow ‘The Code’ whether dressing, talking, smiling, walking, eating, and every other thing you could think of. Quite suffocating. That was the reason free minds like Diana couldn’t become part of the cult. 

As far as social milieu is concerned, Britain is a thinking and talking society. They criticise every thing openly. Referendum in Australia was a close tie. Few concerned voices in UK also questioned paying extra 1 £ tax for the Queen. Consequently, Queen was advised not to wear necklaces etc in public appearances less one small diamond on her pocket.

Nostradamus predicted that Queen's son will not assent to throne which apparently meant that Monarchy will finish few years after demise of Queen. However, Nostradamus'

predictions are subject to interpretation and sometimes it feels that things are forcefully stretched/ fitted in to his prophecies. 

Not certain that Charles etc have the ability to derive that respect and stability as their mother did and it may threaten the aristocracy in terms of its influence. Especially since Harry, Andrew etc have weakened its support. To conclude, her demise seems like beginning of the end of Monarchy in UK.

Queen’s Death - Pak version:

She was daughter of a usurper King George. We got our independence from her or she got rid of subcontinent being enomically unviable colony in the aftermath of WWII. Fair enough that on her coronation, 26 years old Queen was just a figurehead. However, decision of subcontinent’s release was taken in the light of policy lines of the state and monarch (George) who had died just recently.  Protecting state interest is the guiding principle of decision making among developed nations and not the whims of ruling party or monarch unlike us. Neither our ruling party nor monarch (The Sovereign) act as institutions, they just work towards personal aggrandizement and leaving legacy and they end up achieving none.

Anyway 'Good Riddance'. She was the custodian of everything evil in this world may it be British Aristocracy, Free Masons, Rushdi (May he Rot in hell), Qadiyanis, Altaf Hussain, Nawaz Sharif etc.

Finally, read this romantic eulogy on Elizabeth.

"King George VI died in his sleep at the Sandringham estate, in Norfolk, as Elizabeth, his eldest daughter, was more than four thousand miles away, on a safari holiday in Kenya. “She became Queen while in a perch in a tree in Africa, watching the rhinoceros come down to the pool to drink,” Harold Nicolson, the diplomat and politician, wrote in his diary. A member of the royal party later recollected an auspicious occurrence: around sunrise, an eagle had soared over Elizabeth’s head at roughly the moment when the King died."

But no matter how much the Court writers eulogize EIIR (Elizabeth Second, The Regina), she didn’t earn the throne. It was an accident by birth. And monarchy is an unreal form of existence and unsurprisingly future of monarchy is not so bright in UK.